<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title> &#187; edge boston</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vincentdiamond.com/tag/edge-boston/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vincentdiamond.com</link>
	<description>musings from a romantic smutster</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 18:44:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Edge Boston- Rough Cut review</title>
		<link>http://www.vincentdiamond.com/2008/07/edge-boston-rough-cut-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.vincentdiamond.com/2008/07/edge-boston-rough-cut-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 17:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Recent Releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[edge boston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rough Cut]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vincentdiamond.com/2008/07/edge-boston-rough-cut-review/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I can&#8217;t really tell if he liked it or not, but I kinda think so: http://www.edgeboston.com/index.php?ch=entertainment&#038;sc=books&#038;sc2=reviews&#038;sc3=fiction&#038;id=77620 I dunno; whaddya think? When a writer sees adjectives like tepid and stale in a review, isn&#8217;t that a bad thing? And yet, the romance-ness of the stories is a selling point for this reviewer. Heh. It&#8217;s really my [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p id="top" />I can&#8217;t really tell if he liked it or not, but I kinda think so:</p>
<p>http://www.edgeboston.com/index.php?ch=entertainment&#038;sc=books&#038;sc2=reviews&#038;sc3=fiction&#038;id=77620</p>
<p>I dunno; whaddya think? When a writer sees adjectives like tepid and stale in a review, isn&#8217;t that a bad thing? And yet, the romance-ness of the stories is a selling point for this reviewer. Heh. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s really my first &#8220;cold&#8221; review, meaning I really don&#8217;t know this guy at all, nor does he know me. But it gives readers a feel for the book, and an accurate one: Rough Cut is pretty romantic even if few of the stories really have a happily ever after. And many of the stories are linked so that seems to work for people. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s always interesting to hear/read readers&#8217; interpretations of things. Keeps the writing life interesting. <img src='http://www.vincentdiamond.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vincentdiamond.com/2008/07/edge-boston-rough-cut-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

